| event_payload |
{"ref":"refs/heads/main","befo {"ref":"refs/heads/main","before":"ffdd21a2ae238023f2bb48a632deaabade5e88f1","after":"1a1b37e4669cfd80f87650050894fede8aee6b90","compare_url":"https://gitea.g-hi.com/luoanwu/enterprise-platform/compare/ffdd21a2ae238023f2bb48a632deaabade5e88f1...1a1b37e4669cfd80f87650050894fede8aee6b90","commits":[{"id":"1a1b37e4669cfd80f87650050894fede8aee6b90","message":"test(contracts): 会话准入 planner 的门禁覆盖——20 个可达出口只有 1 个走过，ADMIT 与 SKIP_DUPLICATE 还是同一个结果\n\n同日第一条（5720165）把判定收紧了，但门禁看不到其中绝大部分。对 dist 逐条实测：\nplan() 有 20 个可达出口，check:fixtures 上只走过 1 个（N06 无策略即拒），整张租户策略矩阵\n与 appendRejections 全部 8 行映射都只有单测看着，其中四个出口连单测也没有。\n\n本次判定逻辑一行未改——conversation-message.ts 与 conversation-admission-planner.ts 零改动，\n只动 fixture-evaluator.ts 的可见性，加用例。\n\n1. ADMIT 与 SKIP_DUPLICATE 在夹具里是同一个结果。评估器 plan 分支的判据是 `\"reasons\" in r`，\n 两者都没有 reasons，于是都返回空数组 = ACCEPT。把 ADMIT 全改写成 SKIP_DUPLICATE（或反过来）\n 门禁不会红，而这两者的区别正是「这条消息要不要真的落账」。同一文件里的 append 规则本来就写成\n 「只有 APPEND 算放行」，plan 现在与之同口径：非 ADMIT 即列出出口名。\n\n2. refresh() 在门禁上零覆盖（与公共文件 793d0a1 同形）。planner 三个公开方法里它是唯一没有夹具\n 规则的，版本回退拒绝与坏快照保留 last-known-good 此前只有单测。新增 refresh 规则：\n applied=true 为放行，否则返回 planner 自己给的 reason。\n\n3. 四个出口此前任何地方都没走过，均补单测：TENANT_NOT_ALLOWED（策略里根本没有这个租户，与\n 「请求跨租户」不是一回事）、CONVERSATION_TYPE_NOT_ALLOWED、SENDER_TYPE_NOT_ALLOWED（凭据与\n 发送者类型配套、策略仍不允许该类型，须与 ACTOR_CREDENTIAL_MISMATCH 分开证明）、\n CONVERSATION_TENANT_MISMATCH（映射表把 classify 的 TENANT_MISMATCH 换成 planner 自己的码）。\n\n覆盖：夹具 14 例（正 2 / 反 12）→ 39 例（正 4 / 反 35）；定向测试 23 → 30 例，第一轮的断言一条未动。\n并给此前只断言「拒绝」的 N05 / N06 补上 reasons 声明。plan 与 refresh 各留一例放行（P03 / P04）——\n只有放行一侧也钉住，SKIP_DUPLICATE 与 applied 的区分才有意义。\n\n一处明写不覆盖：appendRejections 的 REJECT → MESSAGE_APPEND_INVALID 按当前控制流不可达——\nclassifyConversationAppend 只在 preflight 失败时返回 REJECT，而 plan() 更早就返回了 preflight 拒绝。\n保留该行作纵深防御，但不造用例假装覆盖，理由写进夹具 description 与蓝图。\n\n未做（越界）：会话 / 成员 / 消息账本、长连接服务、Fact、独立运行服务一件未建，C16 按缺失模块完善清单\n仍卡在「裁决 · 实现」（Owner ADR、三消费者、G4）；Catalog 登记一律未动。\n\n证据：真实工作树 pnpm --dir contracts build / typecheck 绿、check:generated 14 files / 12 schemas\n无漂移、node --test contracts/test/*.test.mjs 382/382、contract-collaboration-messaging 夹具 39/39。\n负向实测两次：把 N19 的声明原因改成 ACTOR_CREDENTIAL_MISMATCH → 门禁 exit 1 并点名该例\n（reasons=[\"SENDER_TYPE_NOT_ALLOWED\"]）；把 N13 的 expect 翻成 ACCEPT → 被 id/expect 一致性规则\n先挡下（exit 1）。两次还原后 exit 0。本次不回绑任何 reports/。\n\nCo-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 \u003cnoreply@anthropic.com\u003e\n","url":"https://gitea.g-hi.com/luoanwu/enterprise-platform/commit/1a1b37e4669cfd80f87650050894fede8aee6b90","author":{"name":"juhailaoluo pro","email":"hillao@juhailaoluodeMacBook-Pro.local","username":""},"committer":{"name":"juhailaoluo pro","email":"hillao@juhailaoluodeMacBook-Pro.local","username":""},"verification":null,"timestamp":"2026-09-18T16:01:18-07:00","added":[],"removed":[],"modified":["contracts/SOURCE.md","contracts/src/domain/collaboration-messaging/fixture-evaluator.ts","contracts/test/collaboration-messaging-domain.test.mjs","contracts/test/fixtures/collaboration-messaging.fixtures.json","docs/domain/conversation-message-blueprint.md"]}],"total_commits":0,"head_commit":{"id":"1a1b37e4669cfd80f87650050894fede8aee6b90","message":"test(contracts): 会话准入 planner 的门禁覆盖——20 个可达出口只有 1 个走过，ADMIT 与 SKIP_DUPLICATE 还是同一个结果\n\n同日第一条（5720165）把判定收紧了，但门禁看不到其中绝大部分。对 dist 逐条实测：\nplan() 有 20 个可达出口，check:fixtures 上只走过 1 个（N06 无策略即拒），整张租户策略矩阵\n与 appendRejections 全部 8 行映射都只有单测看着，其中四个出口连单测也没有。\n\n本次判定逻辑一行未改——conversation-message.ts 与 conversation-admission-planner.ts 零改动，\n只动 fixture-evaluator.ts 的可见性，加用例。\n\n1. ADMIT 与 SKIP_DUPLICATE 在夹具里是同一个结果。评估器 plan 分支的判据是 `\"reasons\" in r`，\n 两者都没有 reasons，于是都返回空数组 = ACCEPT。把 ADMIT 全改写成 SKIP_DUPLICATE（或反过来）\n 门禁不会红，而这两者的区别正是「这条消息要不要真的落账」。同一文件里的 append 规则本来就写成\n 「只有 APPEND 算放行」，plan 现在与之同口径：非 ADMIT 即列出出口名。\n\n2. refresh() 在门禁上零覆盖（与公共文件 793d0a1 同形）。planner 三个公开方法里它是唯一没有夹具\n 规则的，版本回退拒绝与坏快照保留 last-known-good 此前只有单测。新增 refresh 规则：\n applied=true 为放行，否则返回 planner 自己给的 reason。\n\n3. 四个出口此前任何地方都没走过，均补单测：TENANT_NOT_ALLOWED（策略里根本没有这个租户，与\n 「请求跨租户」不是一回事）、CONVERSATION_TYPE_NOT_ALLOWED、SENDER_TYPE_NOT_ALLOWED（凭据与\n 发送者类型配套、策略仍不允许该类型，须与 ACTOR_CREDENTIAL_MISMATCH 分开证明）、\n CONVERSATION_TENANT_MISMATCH（映射表把 classify 的 TENANT_MISMATCH 换成 planner 自己的码）。\n\n覆盖：夹具 14 例（正 2 / 反 12）→ 39 例（正 4 / 反 35）；定向测试 23 → 30 例，第一轮的断言一条未动。\n并给此前只断言「拒绝」的 N05 / N06 补上 reasons 声明。plan 与 refresh 各留一例放行（P03 / P04）——\n只有放行一侧也钉住，SKIP_DUPLICATE 与 applied 的区分才有意义。\n\n一处明写不覆盖：appendRejections 的 REJECT → MESSAGE_APPEND_INVALID 按当前控制流不可达——\nclassifyConversationAppend 只在 preflight 失败时返回 REJECT，而 plan() 更早就返回了 preflight 拒绝。\n保留该行作纵深防御，但不造用例假装覆盖，理由写进夹具 description 与蓝图。\n\n未做（越界）：会话 / 成员 / 消息账本、长连接服务、Fact、独立运行服务一件未建，C16 按缺失模块完善清单\n仍卡在「裁决 · 实现」（Owner ADR、三消费者、G4）；Catalog 登记一律未动。\n\n证据：真实工作树 pnpm --dir contracts build / typecheck 绿、check:generated 14 files / 12 schemas\n无漂移、node --test contracts/test/*.test.mjs 382/382、contract-collaboration-messaging 夹具 39/39。\n负向实测两次：把 N19 的声明原因改成 ACTOR_CREDENTIAL_MISMATCH → 门禁 exit 1 并点名该例\n（reasons=[\"SENDER_TYPE_NOT_ALLOWED\"]）；把 N13 的 expect 翻成 ACCEPT → 被 id/expect 一致性规则\n先挡下（exit 1）。两次还原后 exit 0。本次不回绑任何 reports/。\n\nCo-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 \u003cnoreply@anthropic.com\u003e\n","url":"https://gitea.g-hi.com/luoanwu/enterprise-platform/commit/1a1b37e4669cfd80f87650050894fede8aee6b90","author":{"name":"juhailaoluo pro","email":"hillao@juhailaoluodeMacBook-Pro.local","username":""},"committer":{"name":"juhailaoluo pro","email":"hillao@juhailaoluodeMacBook-Pro.local","username":""},"verification":null,"timestamp":"2026-09-18T16:01:18-07:00","added":[],"removed":[],"modified":["contracts/SOURCE.md","contracts/src/domain/collaboration-messaging/fixture-evaluator.ts","contracts/test/collaboration-messaging-domain.test.mjs","contracts/test/fixtures/collaboration-messaging.fixtures.json","docs/domain/conversation-message-blueprint.md"]},"repository":{"id":116,"owner":{"id":5,"login":"luoanwu","login_name":"","source_id":0,"full_name":"","email":"law@g-hi.com","avatar_url":"https://gitea.g-hi.com/avatar/627574a890388a2aadc80ab38d22f3a0","html_url":"https://gitea.g-hi.com/luoanwu","language":"","is_admin":false,"last_login":"0001-01-01T00:00:00Z","created":"2026-01-30T16:28:30+08:00","restricted":false,"active":false,"prohibit_login":false,"location":"","website":"","description":"","visibility":"public","followers_count":0,"following_count":0,"starred_repos_count":0,"username":"luoanwu"},"name":"enterprise-platform","full_name":"luoanwu/enterprise-platform","description":"","empty":false,"private":false,"fork":false,"template":false,"mirror":false,"size":20041,"language":"","languages_url":"https://gitea.g-hi.com/api/v1/repos/luoanwu/enterprise-platform/languages","html_url":"https://gitea.g-hi.com/luoanwu/enterprise-platform","url":"https://gitea.g-hi.com/api/v1/repos/luoanwu/enterprise-platform","link":"","ssh_url":"git@gitea.g-hi.com:luoanwu/enterprise-platform.git","clone_url":"https://gitea.g-hi.com/luoanwu/enterprise-platform.git","original_url":"","website":"","stars_count":0,"forks_count":0,"watchers_count":1,"branch_count":44,"open_issues_count":0,"open_pr_counter":0,"release_counter":0,"default_branch":"main","archived":false,"created_at":"2026-09-11T07:33:25+08:00","updated_at":"2026-09-19T07:00:28+08:00","archived_at":"1970-01-01T08:00:00+08:00","permissions":{"admin":true,"push":true,"pull":true},"has_code":true,"has_issues":true,"internal_tracker":{"enable_time_tracker":true,"allow_only_contributors_to_track_time":true,"enable_issue_dependencies":true},"has_wiki":true,"has_pull_requests":true,"has_projects":true,"projects_mode":"all","has_releases":true,"has_packages":true,"has_actions":true,"ignore_whitespace_conflicts":false,"allow_merge_commits":true,"allow_rebase":true,"allow_rebase_explicit":true,"allow_squash_merge":true,"allow_fast_forward_only_merge":true,"allow_rebase_update":true,"allow_manual_merge":false,"autodetect_manual_merge":false,"default_delete_branch_after_merge":false,"default_merge_style":"merge","default_allow_maintainer_edit":true,"avatar_url":"","internal":false,"mirror_interval":"","object_format_name":"sha1","mirror_updated":"0001-01-01T00:00:00Z","topics":[],"licenses":[]},"pusher":{"id":5,"login":"luoanwu","login_name":"","source_id":0,"full_name":"","email":"5+luoanwu@noreply.localhost","avatar_url":"https://gitea.g-hi.com/avatar/627574a890388a2aadc80ab38d22f3a0","html_url":"https://gitea.g-hi.com/luoanwu","language":"","is_admin":false,"last_login":"0001-01-01T00:00:00Z","created":"2026-01-30T16:28:30+08:00","restricted":false,"active":false,"prohibit_login":false,"location":"","website":"","description":"","visibility":"public","followers_count":0,"following_count":0,"starred_repos_count":0,"username":"luoanwu"},"sender":{"id":5,"login":"luoanwu","login_name":"","source_id":0,"full_name":"","email":"5+luoanwu@noreply.localhost","avatar_url":"https://gitea.g-hi.com/avatar/627574a890388a2aadc80ab38d22f3a0","html_url":"https://gitea.g-hi.com/luoanwu","language":"","is_admin":false,"last_login":"0001-01-01T00:00:00Z","created":"2026-01-30T16:28:30+08:00","restricted":false,"active":false,"prohibit_login":false,"location":"","website":"","description":"","visibility":"public","followers_count":0,"following_count":0,"starred_repos_count":0,"username":"luoanwu"}}... |