| content |
{"Commits":[{"Sha1":"32d18342e {"Commits":[{"Sha1":"32d18342e53bd0d2d6b697dd82834528a5cabbdc","Message":"docs: refine VFD 2.0 evidence and audit qualifications\n","AuthorEmail":"hillao@juhailaoluodeMacBook-Pro.local","AuthorName":"juhailaoluo pro","CommitterEmail":"hillao@juhailaoluodeMacBook-Pro.local","CommitterName":"juhailaoluo pro","Timestamp":"2026-10-22T16:09:06-07:00"},{"Sha1":"4b3fa0ac31b13fb9590d70eb95c445364f730165","Message":"docs(framework): map adversarial development and VFD 2.0 proposals with quotation measurements\n\nAdd section 9 to the OSDD proposal comparison: map the four-party\nadversarial development proposal and VFD 2.0 (tiered review, protected\nacceptance, L0-L4 feedback, impact analysis, repair loop, evidence gate)\nonto existing mechanisms, and fold in the first measured sample from the\n01 quotation VFD readiness audit. Update the 00 README index row.\n\nCo-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 \u003cnoreply@anthropic.com\u003e\n","AuthorEmail":"hillao@juhailaoluodeMacBook-Pro.local","AuthorName":"juhailaoluo pro","CommitterEmail":"hillao@juhailaoluodeMacBook-Pro.local","CommitterName":"juhailaoluo pro","Timestamp":"2026-10-22T16:03:56-07:00"},{"Sha1":"97015b7629c8eef299e725e9713855284abd3fd7","Message":"docs: compare AIF and VFD with existing development mechanisms\n","AuthorEmail":"hillao@juhailaoluodeMacBook-Pro.local","AuthorName":"juhailaoluo pro","CommitterEmail":"hillao@juhailaoluodeMacBook-Pro.local","CommitterName":"juhailaoluo pro","Timestamp":"2026-10-22T15:43:52-07:00"}],"HeadCommit":{"Sha1":"32d18342e53bd0d2d6b697dd82834528a5cabbdc","Message":"docs: refine VFD 2.0 evidence and audit qualifications\n","AuthorEmail":"hillao@juhailaoluodeMacBook-Pro.local","AuthorName":"juhailaoluo pro","CommitterEmail":"hillao@juhailaoluodeMacBook-Pro.local","CommitterName":"juhailaoluo pro","Timestamp":"2026-10-22T16:09:06-07:00"},"CompareURL":"luoanwu/eios-00-engineering-framework/compare/834e12efe18301ac8df100f3c37e8130a20df849...32d18342e53bd0d2d6b697dd82834528a5cabbdc","Len":3}... |