| content |
{"Commits":[{"Sha1":"1e6f71d84 {"Commits":[{"Sha1":"1e6f71d846a9ad3bcbd04a3f2b5fdb3f69ca1884","Message":"chore(reports): check:gate-flow 回绑 @ 5003319\n\n剥注释后判定结果不变：45 个脚本、33 个有消费入口、12 个流外且全部具名、0 违规。\n\nCo-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 \u003cnoreply@anthropic.com\u003e\n","AuthorEmail":"hillao@juhailaoluodeMacBook-Pro.local","AuthorName":"juhailaoluo pro","CommitterEmail":"hillao@juhailaoluodeMacBook-Pro.local","CommitterName":"juhailaoluo pro","Timestamp":"2026-09-18T01:20:03-07:00"},{"Sha1":"5003319dcea673584371b081f59f4e347a33c4ae","Message":"fix(governance): check:gate-flow 先剥 CI 注释再匹配——否则它会亲手把自己的发现消音\n\n推导层原本直接在 CI 原文上按名匹配。工作流里本来就有\n`# static → 私有包认证 … + 根 pnpm check（含 runtime 静态门禁）` 这样的说明行，\n它没被误判纯属侥幸：`check` 后面跟的是中文括号，不是空白。只要有人写下\n「待 Secret 后加 pnpm image:smoke 这一步」，不剥注释就会把这个门禁**最实的那条发现**\n判成已被消费，随后 F2 还会反过来要求删掉那条登记。\n\n剥注释的代价是可能漏判（shell 里 `#` 之后的真命令被切掉），而漏判只会多要一条登记、\n逼人看一眼，是安全的那一侧。\n\n同时把两条刻意的保守取舍写进文件头，并在登记表 note 里记下测量结论，免得被\"优化\"掉：\n\n一、**不扫脚本正文**。消费确实可能发生在脚本内部，但天真地按名扫正文更糟——实测\n本仓 `lib/gate-flow-core.mjs` 自己的注释里就写着 image:smoke / promotion:check /\ncheck:deployed 三个名字，扫正文会把这个门禁要报的三条发现全部判成已消费。\n\n二、**扫描面只有根 package.json，这是量过之后的决定**。另外三个 pnpm 根逐个测过，\n没有真空缺：runtime 的 check:conformance:differential 被 check-runtime-acceptance\n的 plan 数组 spawn；check-runtime-governance 与 generate-governance-status 被 profile\n运行器与 governance-report 调用；check:kernel / :production / :conformance 是框架给的\nprofile 分组、其成分检查已逐条在 runtime 的 check 链里；identity 的\ncheck:dual-backend-behavior 被该仓 check-runtime-acceptance 调用。这些消费全在脚本\n正文内部，要判它们就得解析 spawn 的实参数组，而那正是第一条否掉的方向。\n\ngate-flow 测试 15 → 18，治理测试 298 → 301。判定结果不变：45 个脚本 / 33 有消费入口 /\n12 流外且全部具名。\n\nCo-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 \u003cnoreply@anthropic.com\u003e\n","AuthorEmail":"hillao@juhailaoluodeMacBook-Pro.local","AuthorName":"juhailaoluo pro","CommitterEmail":"hillao@juhailaoluodeMacBook-Pro.local","CommitterName":"juhailaoluo pro","Timestamp":"2026-09-18T01:19:48-07:00"},{"Sha1":"dbc608b892652e920970ea5368a57a02263d9915","Message":"chore(reports): 工作台两份快照回绑 @ b1c2c0d\n\n本轮部署证据落进运维快照作用域（image-digest / image-smoke / deployed-runtime / runtime-up），\n经 reports:rebind 在 HEAD 的干净检出里重跑，两份同源快照一并带回。\n\n顺带实测：dev overlay 把目录快照按路径只读挂进容器，rebind 带回新文件后\nGET /api/platform/catalog 立刻报出新的 snapshot.provenance.gitSha=b1c2c0d，无需重建容器。\n\nCo-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 \u003cnoreply@anthropic.com\u003e\n","AuthorEmail":"hillao@juhailaoluodeMacBook-Pro.local","AuthorName":"juhailaoluo pro","CommitterEmail":"hillao@juhailaoluodeMacBook-Pro.local","CommitterName":"juhailaoluo pro","Timestamp":"2026-09-18T01:19:18-07:00"},{"Sha1":"b1c2c0dc197166f41437f03707ad0a1bd11448c1","Message":"chore(reports): dev 重新部署证据回绑 @ d8f0920 / 759e559\n\n- image-digest：干净检出构建的 d8f09205c8a5（worktreeDirty=false，contextMode=head）\n- image-smoke：6/6（scope 单 profile、Redis 逻辑库 15、:53009）\n- pg-dump.2026-09-18：切换前七个模块库快照上传 MinIO\n- runtime-up.2026-09-18：22 条读面探针 + 4 条受控执行探针 + 3 条非 canonical 对照，\n 8 条 findings（4 修 4 留裁决），可观测三后端切换后仍有信号\n- deployed-runtime：passed / IMAGE_SOURCE_EQUIVALENT\n\nprovenance.worktreeDirty=true：本工作区有并行会话 WIP，运行面记录只绑定本地；\n镜像证据独立绑定干净检出（image.worktreeDirty=false）。\n\nCo-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 \u003cnoreply@anthropic.com\u003e\n","AuthorEmail":"hillao@juhailaoluodeMacBook-Pro.local","AuthorName":"juhailaoluo pro","CommitterEmail":"hillao@juhailaoluodeMacBook-Pro.local","CommitterName":"juhailaoluo pro","Timestamp":"2026-09-18T01:18:59-07:00"},{"Sha1":"709cd94cfc5cd138b5539053554ef1b4d4dcd4ff","Message":"docs(部署): dev 常驻运行时重新部署与三个运行面取证记录（2026-09-18）\n\ncheck:deployed 从 BUILT_IMAGE_SOURCE_BEHIND 转 passed 的完整过程：四个部署缺口、\n一个被吞掉的真实缺陷、受控执行面的 dev 验收，以及六条仍未闭环的事实。\n作用域只到本机 dev，不外推目标环境签收。\n\nCo-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 \u003cnoreply@anthropic.com\u003e\n","AuthorEmail":"hillao@juhailaoluodeMacBook-Pro.local","AuthorName":"juhailaoluo pro","CommitterEmail":"hillao@juhailaoluodeMacBook-Pro.local","CommitterName":"juhailaoluo pro","Timestamp":"2026-09-18T01:18:52-07:00"}],"HeadCommit":{"Sha1":"1e6f71d846a9ad3bcbd04a3f2b5fdb3f69ca1884","Message":"chore(reports): check:gate-flow 回绑 @ 5003319\n\n剥注释后判定结果不变：45 个脚本、33 个有消费入口、12 个流外且全部具名、0 违规。\n\nCo-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 \u003cnoreply@anthropic.com\u003e\n","AuthorEmail":"hillao@juhailaoluodeMacBook-Pro.local","AuthorName":"juhailaoluo pro","CommitterEmail":"hillao@juhailaoluodeMacBook-Pro.local","CommitterName":"juhailaoluo pro","Timestamp":"2026-09-18T01:20:03-07:00"},"CompareURL":"luoanwu/enterprise-platform/compare/2d4b55254cd0b38f4ae1750038d4a6d9e2ebb30a...1e6f71d846a9ad3bcbd04a3f2b5fdb3f69ca1884","Len":7}... |