| content |
{"Commits":[{"Sha1":"36e0423ef {"Commits":[{"Sha1":"36e0423efe0ddc105136d193bfb594efb9838d62","Message":"chore(reports): 全链回绑 @ 1af0f22，证据零过期零告警\n\n干净树重跑根 pnpm check。check:evidence：34 份已登记，**33 份新鲜 / 0 过期 /\n0 输入未提交 / 0 告警 / 1 例外**（stack-image-pins，其例外自带出口）。\n\n这是本轮治理完善的收口：从九份过期、error 级判定，到零过期零告警。\n\nCo-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 \u003cnoreply@anthropic.com\u003e\n","AuthorEmail":"hillao@juhailaoluodeMacBook-Pro.local","AuthorName":"juhailaoluo pro","CommitterEmail":"hillao@juhailaoluodeMacBook-Pro.local","CommitterName":"juhailaoluo pro","Timestamp":"2026-09-17T18:56:42-07:00"},{"Sha1":"1af0f2210a8ac041a26a97ff5f4965461398ebf1","Message":"feat(governance): 测试地板 652 → 775；动态区回灌今日三级验收\n\ncheck:docs-truth 抓出报告已刷新而动态区未跟上——正是今天修过的那类双真源\n漂移，这次由门禁自己拦住。\n\n- 动态区「真实 DB」：2026-09-13 / 7e26a50 / 652 → 2026-09-18 / 6108357 /\n 775，并写明隔离栈与「破坏性注入只认 ms23-ci 类专用工程」的边界\n- 动态区「浏览器」：2026-09-13 / 7e26a50 → 2026-09-18 / 003aadd，端口如实\n- 棘轮：testsPassed 652 → 775（本轮实测），ownTests 35 → 40、\n ownTestCases 185 → 212（静态 runner 自己抬的，它刻意不动其他 runner 的地板）\n\n棘轮只收紧不放宽：775 是今天真实跑出来的数，此后低于它即红。\n\nCo-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 \u003cnoreply@anthropic.com\u003e\n","AuthorEmail":"hillao@juhailaoluodeMacBook-Pro.local","AuthorName":"juhailaoluo pro","CommitterEmail":"hillao@juhailaoluodeMacBook-Pro.local","CommitterName":"juhailaoluo pro","Timestamp":"2026-09-17T18:56:07-07:00"},{"Sha1":"23281b8f814b350af20b95ab6a4176cdbaf25b0a","Message":"chore(governance): 退役两份无生成脚本的报告，过期证据归零\n\n2026-09-17 目录负责人裁决：两份都退役（删文件 + 撤登记，不留例外）。\n\n两份都是 09-12 手工拼的一次性记录，仓内没有任何脚本能产出它们，因此永远\n无法重跑、只会一直过期；而它们的结论现在都由自动化门禁产出并正确绑定：\n\n- identity-http（8 例）：逐条比对确认与 runtime/test/e2e/identity-profile.test.ts\n 同名，今日已在 check:runtime 的 775 例里跑过并绑 6108357。其自述的\n provenanceMethod 就写着「Post-run source inspection」，本就不是门禁产物\n- mainline-candidate-regression（155 例）：作用域即 governance/{lib,test} 与\n 两个检查器，结论由 node --test governance/test/*.test.mjs 产出，今日 277/277。\n 155 这个数字自 09-12 起无人维护，保留它只会让人以为另有一道独立的候选回归门禁\n\n退役前已核：release-manifest.mjs 与 build-workbench-snapshots.mjs 都不引用\n这两份；其余引用只在 09-12 的历史记录文档与生成式快照字段里，会随重跑更新。\n\nevidence-scopes 登记 36 → 34，note 补记本次裁决与口径（同 stack-image-pins\n例外里写的「倾向 ① 退役」）。\n\ncheck:evidence：33 新鲜 / **0 过期** / 1 例外（stack-image-pins，另有出口）。\ngovernance 测试 277/277。\n\nCo-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 \u003cnoreply@anthropic.com\u003e\n","AuthorEmail":"hillao@juhailaoluodeMacBook-Pro.local","AuthorName":"juhailaoluo pro","CommitterEmail":"hillao@juhailaoluodeMacBook-Pro.local","CommitterName":"juhailaoluo pro","Timestamp":"2026-09-17T18:54:10-07:00"},{"Sha1":"95d0ac8860038d4af6a3d15d4ca35ff0eff52749","Message":"chore(reports): 主线验收与恢复演练重跑通过 @ bc978a8\n\n在专用隔离栈 enterprise-platform-ms23-ci（PG :55485 / Redis :56395 /\nRedpanda :59105）上重跑，源库经 mainline:prepare 新建（platform_{fact,\npermission,audit,owner,consumer}_ci，全部非超级用户 / NOBYPASSRLS）。\n\n- mainline-acceptance passed，四套件 11 / 17 / 19 / 18：fact-read-http、\n fact-persistence、audit-tamper、mainline-revocation-chaos（含重复投递、\n 非连续乱序版本、毒消息 DLQ 与 broker 停机恢复）\n- mainline-restore passed，3 个库逐库 dump + 还原到新建 drill 库，表数\n 12 / 6 / …，逐库 SHA-256 一致；不删除、不重置源库与既往 drill\n- revocation-sla 随之刷新，仍 partial：invalidationPush 的 verdict 依旧是\n measured-with-harness-transport，生产传输未接线\n\n为什么换栈：恢复演练与 Redpanda 混沌用例的 allowlist 只认\nenterprise-platform-{ms23,ms23-ci,adversarial} 三个 compose 工程，\n共享的 ep-delivery 与 dev 常驻 stack 永远不匹配——这是故意的护栏，\n破坏性注入不得指向共享底座。dev 常驻栈全程未被触碰。\n\ncheck:evidence 过期 4 → 2，余下两份都没有生成脚本，另行处置。\n\nCo-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 \u003cnoreply@anthropic.com\u003e\n","AuthorEmail":"hillao@juhailaoluodeMacBook-Pro.local","AuthorName":"juhailaoluo pro","CommitterEmail":"hillao@juhailaoluodeMacBook-Pro.local","CommitterName":"juhailaoluo pro","Timestamp":"2026-09-17T18:50:15-07:00"},{"Sha1":"bc978a8a99636b34e0bc69b018ee6ce8bd6192b9","Message":"chore(reports): identity 模块 UI 验收重跑通过 @ 828f178\n\n真实统一 Next 前端 + identity profile + 专用 PostgreSQL/Redis，2 个浏览器级\n用例全绿，由 90cda56 重绑 828f178（作用域内此前累计 21 个文件变更）。\n端口 web :7352 / api :7353。\n\nCo-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 \u003cnoreply@anthropic.com\u003e\n","AuthorEmail":"hillao@juhailaoluodeMacBook-Pro.local","AuthorName":"juhailaoluo pro","CommitterEmail":"hillao@juhailaoluodeMacBook-Pro.local","CommitterName":"juhailaoluo pro","Timestamp":"2026-09-17T18:43:48-07:00"}],"HeadCommit":{"Sha1":"36e0423efe0ddc105136d193bfb594efb9838d62","Message":"chore(reports): 全链回绑 @ 1af0f22，证据零过期零告警\n\n干净树重跑根 pnpm check。check:evidence：34 份已登记，**33 份新鲜 / 0 过期 /\n0 输入未提交 / 0 告警 / 1 例外**（stack-image-pins，其例外自带出口）。\n\n这是本轮治理完善的收口：从九份过期、error 级判定，到零过期零告警。\n\nCo-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 \u003cnoreply@anthropic.com\u003e\n","AuthorEmail":"hillao@juhailaoluodeMacBook-Pro.local","AuthorName":"juhailaoluo pro","CommitterEmail":"hillao@juhailaoluodeMacBook-Pro.local","CommitterName":"juhailaoluo pro","Timestamp":"2026-09-17T18:56:42-07:00"},"CompareURL":"luoanwu/enterprise-platform/compare/f9cb195319422eac06bd2111e1034e956ebcafb0...36e0423efe0ddc105136d193bfb594efb9838d62","Len":8}... |